Case Studies · Powered by the Faria-Lequay Shift Pattern Index™
Three teams that were working well, and the composition each could not see from the inside.
Choose a case to read the full story, or scroll for a short summary of each.
The Three Cases
Different teams. Different risks. One analytical principle.
Absence
The Room Where No One Said Wait
A nine-person, founder-led team produced eighteen pattern positions, and not one of them was Regulator. Agreement came easily because everyone leaned toward movement. The response was to create deliberate friction and rethink capability coverage in hiring and decisions.
Read the Full Case →Concentration
The Balance That Concealed a Dependency
A consultancy leadership team showed a near-perfect 50.4 / 49.6 split between planning and execution, yet its capacity for new direction depended on one executive. The response was to make ownership and handoffs more intentional.
Read the Full Case →Overconcentration
When the Strengths That Built the Company Became the Constraint
Every founder led with vision or exploration, the strengths that built the company. Regulation and sequencing were thin as the organization scaled. The response was to build structure around the founders rather than ask them to become different people.
Read the Full Case →How to Read These Cases
The analytical unit is the team, not the individual.
Individual profiles establish each participant’s Primary and Secondary Shift Patterns. Team Shift Analysis then looks at how those patterns combine, concentrate, or disappear when people operate together. The result is not a judgment about whether a team is good or bad. It is a structured view of the response capabilities the team naturally carries, and the ones it may need to hold deliberately.
These cases illustrate observed team-composition dynamics. They are not intended to establish causal claims, population-level norms, or predictive outcomes. Client-identifying details have been generalized. Download all three cases as a PDF.
Reactive teams absorb change. Intentional teams move through it.
See what your team carries, and what it may need to hold deliberately.